Vasiliki Nihas.
Vasiliki Nihas, speaks on the concern that the FitzGerald Report was too narrow.
1996
18 July 2002
Interview for Making Multicultural Australia, 1996.
mov (Quicktime);
--
1min 15sec
VASILIKI NIHAS
Consultant to government agencies (multicultural and access and equity policies) and former Assistant Secretary, Office of Multicultural Affairs
I think there were concerns that the FitzGerald Report was too narrow. Basically it started putting a price on a lot of services that we believed should be more a right rather than something that needed to be paid for. It certainly brought about a shift in terms of the user-pays syndrome...
I think it's much harder to continue walking down that path with any certainty, which is what the FitzGerald Report tried to do - to say that you have to take out Australian citizenship to prove that you are a bona fide Australian, and that's going a bit further than what they did, but to say that or to move in that direction I think has enormous problems attached to it...
I think that’s problematic because it’s extremely difficult to say or to articulate what commitment is, without ending up in a situation like McCarthyism and the witch hunts of the ‘50s. I think it’s a very dangerous path to be treading. I think it’s perfectly acceptable to say that there is a bottom line in regard to multiculturalism, such as the law, OK. The law is there, the law is the bottom line, the law is something which needs to be obeyed by all... That’s fine. And there are responsibilities attached to that.
Interview for Making Multicultural Australia, 1996.
Visit the multicultural Library for other documents, video, audio and images.